Back to News
Regulation & Legislation
3 min read

Netherlands And Finland Diverge On Offshore Operators

Netherlands And Finland Diverge On Offshore Operators
Share:

Two Market Openings, Two Regulatory Choices

When a country replaces a monopoly or prohibition with a licensing model, demand already exists. Players have often spent years using offshore sites, so the first licensing round decides who captures that established activity.

The key policy choice is simple: exclude operators that served local players without a licence, or license them and let them migrate those customers into the regulated market. The Netherlands chose exclusion in 2021. Finland is taking a more permissive route ahead of its market opening on 1 July 2027.

The Dutch Model: Past Conduct First

Before October 2021, online gambling was prohibited in the Netherlands, yet Dutch players still used offshore operators. The Dutch regulator, KSA, assessed whether applicants had targeted the market without a licence during the two years and nine months before applying.

That rule shaped the launch. On 1 October 2021, ten operators received licences. Some applicants withdrew because they did not want to stop serving Dutch players during the review period. Others failed on separate compliance checks.

For operators, this approach raised the cost of early entry. Brands with an existing Dutch customer base could not simply convert that traffic into regulated revenue. For the regulator, the benefit was clear separation between the legal market and recent unlicensed activity.

The Finnish Model: Customer Migration Into Regulation

Finland is opening its market on 1 July 2027, and roughly half of Finnish betting is currently placed outside the regulated system. By June 2026, about 50 applications had reportedly been filed, and many Finnish players are likely already active on the sites of those applicants.

Finnish authorities still plan to review an operator's compliance history. An operator that continues serving Finnish players without a licence while its application is under review risks rejection. That creates a narrow path: prior market presence may help, but ongoing breaches can still block approval.

If an operator secures a Finnish licence, it may keep its existing players if those customers agree to be transferred to the newly licensed Finnish entity. This matters because it reduces the friction of channelisation, meaning the movement of players from unlicensed sites into the regulated framework.

Marketing Rules Could Magnify the Advantage

Finland's proposed marketing limits are tight. Welcome bonuses and other acquisition bonuses are banned. Influencer promotion and affiliate advertising are also restricted. Affiliates are third-party websites that earn commission for referring players.

On social platforms, only an operator's own accounts are allowed, and audience interaction is heavily limited. Search advertising is permitted. These rules apply equally to all licensees, yet the commercial effect will not be equal.

An operator that already has Finnish customers can focus on retention and migration. A new entrant must build awareness and trust from zero, without common acquisition tools. That changes launch economics, especially for challenger brands without a pre-existing local database.

Why This Matters For The Industry

The Dutch and Finnish examples show that market opening rules do more than set compliance standards. They define the first distribution of market share. They also influence how expensive it is for operators to acquire players legally after launch.

For suppliers, these models affect demand for CRM tools, identity checks, player transfer systems and compliance monitoring. For operators, the message is direct: historical market conduct now has a measurable impact on licensing prospects and on day-one revenue potential.

Finland's approach gives incumbent offshore brands a realistic route into regulation, provided they pass suitability checks and manage customer transfers correctly. The Dutch model denied that shortcut. The result is two very different templates for channelising offshore demand into a licensed market.

Source: iGR Telegram

🌐 Source: iGR Telegram